FUNDING BUTTON LINK
Showing posts with label project and business management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label project and business management. Show all posts

Saturday, August 11, 2012

BAO - Business Analytics And Observation: Another Mandatory Acronym.

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .





I am getting increasingly sick of acronyms, and believe that most of them are created as repackaging and selling tools more than as a means of pneumonic memorization or useful shorthand. BAO, which stands for "Business Analytics And Observation" is being touted as a phenomenon unto itself by the likes of IBM and other giant firms who cater to the larger-sized businesses, or consulting firms who seek a Fortune 500 caliber clientele, who are flush with budget funds for expenditures which may not be immediately tied (via cause and effect) to results.

Here it is: BAO - Business Analytics And Observation. It's pleasant, sounds faintly Brazilian, and is somewhat redundant.

As an interesting analytic sidebar of my own, I've noticed that these acronyms are created by companies which were once in the manufacturing (production) sector or involved in rendering a specif professional service, such as accounting, auditing or systems analysis; and they tend to be used by every employee and consultant inhabiting the C-Suite of every size and scale of business in order to impress.

Thus BAO, or Business Analytics And Optimization has now become a field of subspecialization unto itself. Those of us in the businesses of raising venture capital, business planning and project management had best learn about this hybrid field, lest we be left behind in the ever-more-competitive pursuit of employment, contracts, clients and capital.

IBM has a well-prepared and informative video about BAO. While I believe that it is a very thinly-veiled sales pitch, I believe that it should be required viewing for every reader of The Business And Project Planning And Management Blog, The Global Futurist Blog and any of my other blogs.

On the lighter side, I do believe that the old saying that I grew up with as a Baby Boomer needs to be amended to reflect today's international and multi-level obsession with acronyms in lieu of knowledge, utility and literacy:

Douglas E. Castle says: "If you can't win them over with substance, assault them with acronyms!"

Click on the button below to see the IBM/ Cognos presentation:




Douglas E. Castle

p.s. The name of my pet personal blog is The Daily Burst Of Brilliance. It's not daily, and it's not necessarily brilliant -- but it's wonderful to aim high.









View DOUGLAS E. CASTLE's profile on LinkedIn


Douglas E Castle
All Blogs & RSS Feeds

Share this page
Contact Douglas Castle
Follow Me on Pinterest

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Planning And Management: Dynamic And Interactive

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .






Businesses and individual projects require both planning and management. This seems obvious, but in the shuffle of our real-world in real time, the obvious is often overlooked. The plan is the road map based upon your initial assessment of the goal to be achieved and your evaluation of the facts available to you, as cartographer, at the time. Management has to do with driving the organizational vehicle in accordance with the road map. But any plan is only as good as the assumptions which were incorporated in its manufacture, and driving on "plan autopilot" (i.e., without making observations, monitoring progress and swerving, braking or accelerating as necessary in response to an inaccurate map or GPS ) can be absolutely lethal.

Here are some observations to be acted upon, and to be incorporated in both processes:

1) Both planning and management are dynamic and interactive processes. Neither functions properly without the input of the other, and both must be amenable to some flexibility and adaptation as new knowledge is unearthed and as the contextual scenario (the environment) changes;

2) Process and progress monitoring must be frequent, with any issues being noted and reported by managers to planners, as well as vice versa;

3) Rather than viewing a change in the route as a variation or deviation from the plan, it must, of necessity be viewed as a response to either a change in plans, or in anticipation of a change in plans;

4) Communications must be as frequent as possible, with open, receptive dialogue - both parties have a shared interest in achieving the cited goal, and this is more important than either blindly 'sticking to the plan' or proceeding along a substantially different path (on the part of management) in disregard for the planning process;

5) Part of planning requires review and adaptation. Attaining a goal is an iterative, continuous process. It necessitates coordination (here comes a terribly trite metaphor, which is probably why you'll remember it) and real-time communication between the pilot and the control tower if the plane is to land safely, with all passengers and cargo undamaged.

Planning and management must be dynamic and interactive within any operation or organization. This requires observation, timely and candid communications, modifications (as may be prudent and required for course correction), and often an adjustment in expectations. Command and control require collaboration, cooperation and mutual respect.

Ultimately, the success in attaining any agreed-upon goal will be due to the optimal combination of Human intelligence, observation, communication, adaptability and mutual respect.

This would seem to be so simple. Yet it represents the greatest challenge in planning and management. In all of the Project Manager and Strategic Planner conversations, you'll generally hear a great deal of techno-speak and acronyms, but very little along the lines of  "How are things progressing? How are you doing? Are you noticing any problems? Should we be doing anything differently? We would appreciate your input."

We will surely fail at attaining our greatest and most noble objectives if we insist on sterilizing and De-Humanizing the setting of goals, the construction of plans, and the management of real live people as well as of flow-chartable processes and programs.

It is time to abandon the rhetoric, the acronyms and the hyper-specialization vacuum and time to get back into the business of working together harmoniously.

Douglas E Castle, at http://aboutDouglasCastle.blogspot.com





HEADER TO SAVE TROUBLED COMPANIES
WE FIX BROKEN COMPANIES - DouglasECastleBlog
twitter-button.net
View DOUGLAS E. CASTLE's profile on LinkedIn
Douglas E. Castle
Bookmark and Share